[...]-
I read the article you sent via a link- thank you. It was personally validating, relieved me of some frustration regarding lack of useful information for doctors, as well as summarized a number of things I have learned this past year (also a couple of things I didn't know such as "tapering strips" from Europe...hmmmmm

). I found it to be clear, concise and up to date (as far as I know) as well as potentially helpful to whatever medical providers will read it. I sent it to my provider (one of them).
I noticed
it did not mention Benzobuddies.org, however, when speaking of peer support or other online resources. Do you know why? (I briefly looked at The Withdrawal Project (which was mentioned in the article), and it appears it's not online support, but rather a way for people to connect for potential in person engagements. Of course I didn't read a lot, so may not have that right.
I mention this because I have let my provider know about Benzobuddies and the assistance I have valued here, yet this article does not speak of it. To me this suggests that doctors utilizing the article wouldn't know of a valuable resource for their patients.
I realize BB might be embedded in another source mentioned in the article, or that the article can only tell of research based material (perhaps TWP is more empirically based?). Finally, it might be that there are competing online support communities and the writes did not want to jump into the mix.
Any thoughts?
thanks again,
Rascal