My point has nothing to do with good or bad, labels, or whateva.. Its about the right treatment protocols and correct support for each situation..
Like not being escalated up in dose because Drs clearly see one ISNT an addict/ed, but dont understand the severity of tolerance and physical dependence.. (oh it must be increasing pain, or anxiety, or insomnia, or whateva.. -Take more..). Furthermore, through denial of WD SX (the dependence) I [...] seen it lead to unnecessary surgical procedures and worse..
Then later or alternately, -“Its addiction”, -thus detox, CT, and “rehab” will solve the problem..
That just left me protracted, polydrugged, and counting new losses daily..
Im not here to dictate anyones situation, but no one can tell me language and its understanding [...] impact treatment protocols, and that treatment protocols dont correlate with the “experience” or outcome...
Perhaps if one is maintaining a CT then it’s a moot point by then, the (potential) damage is already done, assuming we are talking about a tolerance or physical dependence situation.. Were is solely an addiction situation, then great, one as well on their way to healing or perhaps a sobriety..
But what if its both.. -Thats where it gets tricky I guess.. One would [...] to decide what takes precedent, if things like dose management [...] be maintained through a taper..
If one doesnt believe tapers of varying and personal length are “best practice”, then thats another story... -Hopefully one without a strong physical dependence involved..
At a personal level, -whatever works and gets one through is fine by me.. My concern is the bigger, broader picture where language affects treatment...
-as explained in the above link..