Doctors call for delaying deployment of 5G due to health risks.

This could be very serious for us.

 

re: Frank Clegg Former President of Microsoft Canada: “It’s not been made clear to the public that 5G won’t just be another number and a letter on your cell phone. It requires an entirely new infrastructure of thousands of small cellular antennas to be erected throughout the cities where it’s going to be installed.”

 

What would 5G infrastructure look like? Small cell antennas could be placed as close as every 3rd hydro pole.

 

Scientists from 42 countries are now warning their governments about the emerging health problems associated with wireless radiation, and Canadian doctors and scientists have added their voices.

 

Great. I was hoping there would be one more thing to worry about. 

Great. I was hoping there would be one more thing to worry about. 

 

Sorry, Challis.  I'm just the messenger. Did you get to see the video above? There are so many indications out there about the dangers this poses that are beyond worrisome. We need to try to figure out ways we can protect against 5G on our own, since they're rolling & rushing this thing out there as we speak without proper testing. With a compromised CNS, we need all the help we can get.

 

Stay safe.

Excellent and very important post, doriia. Thank you for helping to bring this to light. I just pray with all my heart that people take notice.

 

Secret 5G roll-out:

 

5G antennas are reportedly being installed near schools throughout America during the Coronavirus shutdown. (Near your kids, people! Their CNS is still developing.) Data is being collected by many people showing police, AT&T workers and others installing the antennas. They put out a tremendous amount of microwave radiation that causes many serious health threats.

 

People MUST tell their city officials and all government representatives – WE DO NOT WANT 5G. In February, Switzerland banned 5G for this reason. (You can check reputable news sources to verify this truth.) Groups in my country are working frantically to ensure the same over here.

 

For more details, a good source is: https://www.takebackyourpower.net/surveillance-5g-fast-tracked-under-coronavirus-pretext/

 

5G Radiation Dangers - A Definitive Guide: https://emfacademy.com/5g-radiation/

 

(A medical doctor referred me to these sites.)

Hmm. I closed down another thread containing similar nonsense a few days ago. I guess I'll leave this one open for now since I have come across an 'anatomy of a conspiracy theory' type article at Wired. I suggest that it is worth a read.

 

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/5g-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory

Folks - reading and believing this baseless nonsense does nothing except to fuel your anxiety.  If that's what you choose (more false information and anxiety in your life), read and worry away.

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/5g-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory

It’s not a secret rollout—at least not herein the U.S.  Those small cells being used for 5g are also transmitting 4g...in fact for the sub 6GHz 5g they use the same radio.

 

The RF exposure regulations were created after much work between various health and technical agencies.  If you think these are bogus regulations then complain to your government, they are the ones who approved this. 

 

As for the rest, 5G only provides for more flexibility in deployment over 4G and it can support more use cases due to its variable time slot and frequency spacing.  But things like beamforming and 1Gbps throughput are possible on 4G today.

 

Here is a link

 

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/TR/Transcripts/2019_0076_0005_TSTMNY.pdf

 

 

It’s not a secret rollout—at least not herein the U.S.  Those small cells being used for 5g are also transmitting 4g...in fact for the sub 6GHz 5g they use the same radio.

 

The RF exposure regulations were created after much work between various health and technical agencies.  If you think these are bogus regulations then complain to your government, they are the ones who approved this. 

 

As for the rest, 5G only provides for more flexibility in deployment over 4G and it can support more use cases due to its variable time slot and frequency spacing.  But things like beamforming and 1Gbps throughput are possible on 4G today.

 

Here is a link

 

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/TR/Transcripts/2019_0076_0005_TSTMNY.pdf

 

 

Is this something where will immediately see the difference by getting a 5G phone or is it something that will gradually become faster over several years?  Is it worth it getting a 5G phone right away?

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/5g-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory

 

I'm not sure about the above reference to coronavirus. That surely sounds like a over-the-top conspiracy theory. The OP and attached video only indicated a co-relation to microwave radiation and the lack of reliable testings done before a massive 5G roll-out. Reasonably, to be aware of something of this magnitude would cause us stress. specially when so many entities around the world in so many counties are raising concern. 

@[to...]

 

A 5G phone is not worth it today.  Unless you have 5G service where you need it AND you need consistent high throughput.  For the common use cases 4G is more than adequate, but high end phones this year and many phones next year will include a 5G chipset. 

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/5g-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory

 

I'm not sure about the above reference to coronavirus. That surely sounds like a over-the-top conspiracy theory. The OP and attached video only indicated a co-relation to microwave radiation and the lack of reliable testings done before a massive 5G roll-out. Reasonably, to be aware of something of this magnitude would cause us stress. specially when so many entities around the world in so many counties are raising concern.

 

It surely is an 'over-the-top conspiracy theory'. I understand that you were not referencing that particular CT in your opening post. It is just an example of the irrationality some people associate with 5G. And, as I said, there was another thread on this subject I cause to close down only a few days ago.

I thought some readers here would appreciate this short explanation about 5G, any supposed 'risks', and the shooting down of various associated conspiracy theories.

 

Another video explaining 5G.

 

bigclivedotcom:

 

Big Clive is an electrical engineer. I have watched a number of his videos over the years.

I’m also an Electrical Engineer and Physicist.  This stuff is highly technical and so I don’t blame people for not understanding what is going on and being nervous about it. I just try to give them some friendly facts and information.

 

There is a lot of misinformation out there and plenty of people just looking for attention.  The first clue that this is bogus information is when somebody says that something is being done “secretly”.  It’s really tough to keep anything secret and with 5g, it is impossible.

 

5G is based on an internationally created standard with participants from all over the world.  Then you have companies such as Ericsson, Nokia, Qualcomm, Huawei, and software partners such as Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, all devoting 1000s of engineers to 5G, and you quickly see that this is no secret.

 

The bigger problem is people constantly playing with their phones...but that is their own choice...

NIH US National Library of Medicine

 

Towards 5G Communication Systems: Are There Health Implications?

Agostino Di Ciaula. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018 Apr.

 

Int J Hyg Environ Health

. 2018 Apr;221(3):367-375.

doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Author

 

Agostino Di Ciaula  1

Affiliation

 

1 Division of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Bisceglie (ASL BAT), Bisceglie, Italy; International Society of Doctors for Environment (ISDE), Arezzo, Italy. Electronic address: agostinodiciaula@tiscali.it.

PMID: 29402696

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.011

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29402696/

 

Abstract

 

The spread of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) is rising and health effects are still under investigation. RF-EMF promote oxidative stress, a condition involved in cancer onset, in several acute and chronic diseases and in vascular homeostasis. Although some evidences are still controversial, the WHO IARC classified RF-EMF as "possible carcinogenic to humans", and more recent studies suggested reproductive, metabolic and neurologic effects of RF-EMF, which are also able to alter bacterial antibiotic resistance. In this evolving scenario, although the biological effects of 5G communication systems are very scarcely investigated, an international action plan for the development of 5G networks has started, with a forthcoming increment in devices and density of small cells, and with the future use of millimeter waves (MMW). Preliminary observations showed that MMW increase skin temperature, alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes, could generate ocular damages, affect neuro-muscular dynamics. Further studies are needed to better and independently explore the health effects of RF-EMF in general and of MMW in particular. However, available findings seem sufficient to demonstrate the existence of biomedical effects, to invoke the precautionary principle, to define exposed subjects as potentially vulnerable and to revise existing limits. An adequate knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms linking RF-EMF exposure to health risk should also be useful in the current clinical practice, in particular in consideration of evidences pointing to extrinsic factors as heavy contributors to cancer risk and to the progressive epidemiological growth of noncommunicable diseases.

 

Keywords: 5G; Cancer; MMW; Noncommunicable diseases; Prevention; RF-EMF.

 

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

 

 

 

 

Americans for Responsible Technology

 

https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/scientific-studies

 

There are more than 1,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning the biological effects of RF radiation. Here we present some of the most recent.

 

I. Effects On Fetal And Newborn Development

​

Mother’s Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields Before and During Pregnancy is Associated with Risk of Speech Problems in Offspring. Zarei, S., et al. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 9(1):61-68 (2019).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30881935/

 

Prenatal Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Field and Its Impact on Fetal Growth. Ren, Y., et al. Environmental Health (2019).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30635061/

 

The Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation on Mice Fetus Weight, Length and Tissues. Alimohammadi, I., et al. Data in Brief 19:2189-2194 (2018).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141437/pdf/main.pdf

 

Effects of Prenatal Exposure to WiFi Signal (2.45 GHz) on Postnatal Development and Behavior in Rat: Influence of Maternal Restraint. Othman, H., et al. Behavioral Brain Research 326: 291-301 (2017).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28288806/

 

Exposure to Magnetic Field Non-Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Miscarriage: A prospective Cohort Study. Li, De-Kun, et al. Scientific Reports (2017).

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-16623-8

 

Postnatal Development and Behavior Effects of In-Utero Exposure of Rats to Radiofrequency Waves Emitted From Conventional WiFi Devices. Othman, H., et al. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 52:239-247 (2017).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28458069/

 

Lasting Hepatotoxic Effects of Prenatal Mobile Phone Exposure. Yilmaz, A., et al. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 30(11): 1355-1359 (2017).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27427155/

 

Multiple Assessment Methods of Prenatal Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation from Telecommunication in the Mothers and Children’s Environmental Health (MOCEH) Study. Choi, Ha, et al. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 29(6):959-972 (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27869246/

 

The Use of Signal-Transduction and Metabolic Pathways to Predict Human Disease Targets from Electric and Magnetic Fields Using in vitro Data in Human Cell Lines. Parham, Portier, et al. Frontiers in Public Health (2016).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013261/

 

A Review on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and the Reproductive System. Asghari, Khaki, et al. Electronic Physician 8(7):2655-2662 (2016).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014506/

 

Genotoxicity Induced by Foetal and Infant Exposure to Magnetic Fields and Modulation of Ionising Radiation Effects. Udroiu, Antoccia, et al. PLoS One (2015).

 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142259

 

Oxidative Stress of Brain and Liver is Increased by Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz) Exposure of Rats During Pregnancy and the Development of Newborns. Çelik, Ömer, et al. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 75(B):134-139 (2015).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26520617/

 

Neurodegenerative Changes and Apoptosis Induced by Intrauterine and Extrauterine Exposure of Radiofrequency Radiation. Güler, Göknur, et al. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 75(B):128-133 (2015).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26520616/

 

Maternal Exposure to a Continuous 900-MHz Electromagnetic Field Provokes Neuronal Loss and Pathological Changes in Cerebellum of 32-Day-Old Female Rat Offspring. Odaci, Ersan, et al. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 75(B):105-110 (2015).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26391347/

 

Different Periods of Intrauterine Exposure to Electromagnetic Field: Influence on Female Rats' Fertility, Prenatal and Postnatal Development. Alchalabi, Aklilu, et al.  Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction 5(1):14-23 (2015).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2305050015000536

 

Use of Mobile Phone During Pregnancy and the Risk of Spontaneous Abortion. Mahmoudabadi, Ziaei, et al. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering  13:34 (2015).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416385/

 

Oxidative Mechanisms of Biological Activity of Low-Intensity Radiofrequency Radiation. Yakymenko, et al.  Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 34(3):1-16 (2015).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26151230/

 

Effects of Prenatal 900 MHz Electromagnetic Field Exposures on the Histology of Rat Kidney. Ulubay, et al. International Journal of Radiation Biology 91(1):35-41 (2015).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25084839/

 

The Effect of Exposure of Rats During Prenatal Period to Radiation Spreading from Mobile Phones on Renal Development. Bedir, et al. Renal Failure 37(2):305-9 (2014).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25691088/

 

Dosimetric Study of Fetal Exposure to Uniform Magnetic Fields at 50 Hz. Liorni, et al. Bioelectromagnetics  35(:580-97 (2014).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25266786/

 

Influence of Pregnancy Stage and Fetus Position on the Whole-Body and Local Exposure of the Fetus to RF-EMF. Varsier, et al. Physics in Medicine and Biology 59(17):4913-26 (2014).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25098501/

 

Autism-Relevant Social Abnormalities in Mice Exposed Perinatally to Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. Alsaeed, et al. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 37:58-6 (2014).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24970316/

 

Pyramidal Cell Loss in the Cornu Ammonis of 32-day-old Female Rats Following Exposure to a 900 Megahertz Electromagnetic Field During Prenatal Days 13–21. Bas, et al. NeuroQuantology Volume 11, Issue 4: 591-599 (2013).

 

http://neuroquantology.com/index.php/journal/article/viewFile/701/625

 

The Effects of 900 Megahertz Electromagnetic Field Applied in the Prenatal Period on Spinal Cord Morphology and Motor Behavior in Female Rat Pups. Odaci, et al. NeuroQuantology Volume 11, Issue 4: 573-581 (2013).

 

http://www.neuroquantology.com/index.php/journal/article/view/698

 

Fetal Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure From 800-1900 MHz-Rated Cellular Telephones Affects Neurodevelopment and Behavior in Mice. Aldad, Gan, et al. Scientific Reports 2(312) (2013).

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep00312

 

Cranial and Postcranial Skeletal Variations Induced in Mouse Embryos by Mobile Phone Radiation. Fragopoulou, Koussoulakos, et al. Pathophysiology 17(3):169-77 (2010).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19854628/

 

Dysbindin Modulates Prefrontal Cortical Glutamatergic Circuits and Working Memory Function in Mice. Jentsch, et al Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 2601–8 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19641486/

 

Stress Signalling Pathways that Impair Prefrontal Cortex Structure and Function. Arnsten, A. F. National Review of Neuroscience 10, 410–22 (2009).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907136/

 

Maternal Occupational Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Brain Cancer in the Offspring. Li, Mclaughlin, et al. Cancer Causes & Control 20(6):945-55 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19224378/

 

Reproductive and Developmental Effects of EMF in Vertebrate Animal Models. Pourlis, A.F. Pathophysiology 16(2-3):179-89 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19272761/

 

Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure to Cell Phone Use and Behavioral Problems in Children. Divan, Kheifets, et al. Epidemiology19(4):523-29 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18467962/

 

Effects of Prenatal Exposure to a 900 MHz Electromagnetic Field on the Dentate Gyrus of Rats: A Stereological and Histopathological Study. Odaci, et al. Brain Research 1238: 224–229 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18761003/

 

Exposure to Cell Phone Radiation Up-Regulates Apoptosis Genes in Primary Cultures of Neurons and Astrocytes. Zhao, et al. Science Digest 412: 34–38 (2007).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17187929/

 

Cell Death Induced by GSM 900-MHz and DCS 1800-MHz Mobile Telephony Radiation. Panagopoulos, et al. Mutation Research626, 69–78 (2006).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17045516/

 

Ultra High Frequency-Electromagnetic Field Irradiation During Pregnancy Leads to an Increase in Erythrocytes Micronuclei Incidence in Rat Offspring. Ferreira, Knakievicz, et al. Life Sciences 80(1):43-50 (2006).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16978664/

 

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Biederman, J. & Faraone, S. V. Lancet 366, 237–248 (2005).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16023516/

 

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: An Overview of the Etiology and a Review of the Literature Relating to the Correlates and Lifecourse Outcomes for Men and Women. Brassett-Harknett, A. & Butler, N. Clinical Psychology Review 27,188–210 (2005).

 

http://europepmc.org/article/med/16081194

 

II. Effects On Young Children

 

Electromagnetic Fields, Pulsed Radiofrequency Radiation, and Epigenetics: How Wireless Technologies May Affect Childhood Development. Sage, C. & Burgio, E. Child Development (2017).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28504324/

 

Prospective Cohort Analysis of Cellphone Use and Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties in Children. Sudan, M, et al. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27217533/

 

Why Children Absorb More Microwave Radiation than Adults: The Consequences. Morgan, Kesari, et al. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2(4):196-204 (2014).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583

 

Epidemiological Characteristics of Mobile Phone Ownership and Use in Korean Children and Adolescents. Byun, Yoon-Hwan, et al. Environmental Health and Toxicology 28 (2013).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909745/

 

A Prospective Study of In-Utero Exposure to Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Childhood Obesity. Li, De-Kun, et al. Scientific Reports 2.540 (2012).

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep00540

 

Exposure to Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: Update of the Epidemiological evidence. Schüz and Joachim. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 107(3):339-42 (2011).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610711001076

 

Cell Phone Use and Behavioural Problems in Young Children. Divan, Kheifets, et al. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health 66(6):524-9 (2010).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49665228_Cell_phone_use_and_behavioural_problems_in_young_children

 

Mobile Phones, Radiofrequency Fields, and Health Effects in Children-Epidemiological Studies. Feychting, Maria. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 107(3):343-348 (2010).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610711001210

 

Exposure to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields and Behavioral Problems in Bavarian Children and Adolescents. Thomas, Silke, et al. European Journal of Epidemiology 25(2):135-41 (2009).

 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-009-9408-x

 

The Sensitivity of Children to Electromagnetic Fields. Repacholi, et al. Deventer. Journal of Pediatrics 116(2):303-313 (2005).

 

https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/116/2/e303

 

 

III. Brain Tumors

 

Simulation of The Incidence of Malignant Brain Tumors in Birth Cohorts That Started Using Mobile Phones When They First Became Popular in Japan. Sato, Y., Kojimahara, N., and Yamaguchi, N. Bioelectromagnetics 40(3): 143-149 (2019).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30875091/

 

​Report of Final Results Regarding Brain and Heart Tumors in Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed From Prenatal Life Unitl Natural Death to Mobile Phone Radiofrequency Field Representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM Base Station Environmental Emission. Falcioni, L, et al. Environmental Research (2018).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29530389/

 

Exposure to Cell Phone Radiofrequency Changes Corticotrophin Hormone Levels and Histology of The Brain and Adrenal Glands in Male Wistar Rat. Shahabi, S., et al. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 21:1269-1274 (2018).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312682/

 

Brain Tumours: Rise in Glioblastoma Multiforme Incidence in England 1995-2015 Suggests an Adverse Environmental or Lifestyle Factor. Philips, A., et al. Journal of Environmental and Public Health (2018).

 

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jeph/2018/7910754/

 

The 2100 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation of a 3G-Mobile Phone and the DNA Oxidative Damage in Brain. Sahin, Ozgur, et al. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 75(B):94-98 (2016).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891061816000041

 

Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and the Risk for Glioma - Analysis of Pooled Case- Control Studies in Sweden 1997-2003 and 2007-2009. Hardell and Carlberg. PathoPhysiology 22(1):1-13 (2015).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25466607/

 

Mobile Phone Radiation Causes Brain Tumors and Should Be Classified as a Probable Human Carcinogen. Morgan, Miller, et al. International Journal of Oncology 46:1865-1871 (2015).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273150433_Mobile_phone_radiation_causes_brain_tumors_and_should_be_classified_as_a_probable_human_carcinogen_2A_Review

 

Mobile Phone Use and Brain Tumours in the CERENAT Case-Control Study. Coureau, Bouvier, et al. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 71(7):514-22 (2014).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24816517/

 

Use of Mobile Phones and Cordless Phones is Associated with Increased Risk for Glioma and Acoustic Neuroma. Hardell, Carberg, et al. PathoPhysiology 20(2):85-110 (2013).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23261330/

 

Mobile Phones and Head Tumours: A Critical Analysis of Case-Control Epidemiological Studies. Levis, Minicuci, et al. Open Environmental Sciences 6(1):1-12 (2012).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268300569_Mobile_Phones_and_Head_Tumours_A_Critical_Analysis_of_Case-Control_Epidemiological_Studies

 

On the Association Between Glioma, Wireless Phones, Heredity and Ionising Radiation. Carlberg and Hardell. PathoPhysiology19(4):243-252 (2012).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22939605/

 

Mobile Phones and Head Tumours. The Discrepancies in Cause-Effect Relationships in the Epidemiological Studies - How Do They Arise? Levis, Minicuci, et al. Environmental Health 10:59 (2011).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21679472/

 

Indications of Possible Brain Tumour Risk in Mobile-Phone Studies: Should We Be Concerned? Cardis and Sadetzki. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 68:169-171 (2011).

 

https://oem.bmj.com/content/68/3/169

 

Estimating the Risk of Brain Tumors from Cell Phone Use: Published Case-Control Studies. Morgan, LL. Pathophysiology 16(2-3):137-147 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19356911/

 

Cell Phones and Brain Tumors: A Review Including the Long-Term Epidemiologic Data. Khurana, Teo, et al. Surgical Neurology72(3):205-14 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19328536/

 

Epidemiological Evidence for an Association Between Use of Wireless Phones and Tumor Diseases. Hardell, Carlberg, et al. PathoPhysiology 16(2-3):113-122 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19268551/

 

Histopathological Examinations of Rat Brains After Long-Term Exposure to GSM Mobile Phone Radiation. Grafström, Gustav, et al. Brain Research Bulletin 77(5):257-63 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18782606/

 

Mobile Phone Use and the Risk of Acoustic Neuroma. Lonn, Ahlbom, et al. Epidemiology 15(6):653-659 (2004).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15475713/

 

 

IV. Parotid Gland Tumors

 

Influence of Handheld Mobiles on Parotid: A Cohort Study. Ranjitha, G., et al. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine & Radiology 29:254-258 (2017).

 

http://www.jiaomr.in/article.asp?issn=0972-1363;year=2017;volume=29;issue=4;spage=254;epage=258;aulast=Ranjitha

 

Does Cell Phone Use Increase the Chances of Parotid Gland Tumor Development? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. De Siqueira, de Souza, et al. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine 45(11) (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27935126/

 

Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies on Acoustic Neuroma Diagnosed 1997-2003 and 2007- 2009 and Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones. Hardell, Carlberg, et al. International Journal of Oncology 43(4):1036-144 (2015).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23877578/

 

Using the Hill Viewpoints from 1965 for Evaluating Strengths of Evidence of the Risk for Brain Tumors Associated with use of Mobile and Cordless Phones. Hardell and Carlberg. Reviews on Environmental Health 28(2-3):97-106 (2013).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24192496/

 

Case-Control study of the Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones and the Risk for Malignant Melanoma in the Head and Neck Region. Hardell, Carlberg, et al. Pathophysiology 18(4):325-333 (2011).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468011000320

 

Correlation Between Cellular Phone Use and Epithelial Parotid Gland Malignancies. Duan, Zhang, et al. Clinical Paper Head and Oncology 40(9):966-7 (2011).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21474287/

 

Mobile Phones Use and Risk of Tumors: A Meta-Analysis. Mynf, Ju, et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology 27(33):5565-72 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19826127/

 

Mobile Phone, Cordless Phones and the Risk for Brain Tumours. Hardell and Carlberg. International Journal of Oncology 35(1):5-17 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19513546/

 

Public Health Implications of Wireless Technologies. Sage and Carpenter. PathoPhysiology 16(2-3):233-46 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19285839/

 

Epidemiological Evidence for an Association Between use of Wireless Phones and Tumor Diseases. Hardell, Carlberg, et al. PathoPhysiology 16(2-3):113-122 (2009).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000091

 

Cell Phone Use and Risk of Benign and Malignant Parotid Gland Tumors - A Nationwide Case- Control Study. Sadetzki, Chetrit, et al. American Journal of Epidemiology 167(4):457-467 (2008).

 

https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/167/4/457/233171

 

V. Other Malignancies

 

The Carcinogenic Potential of Non-Ionizing Radiations: The Cases of S-50 Hz MF and 1.8 GHz GSM Radiofrequency Radiation. Soffritti, M. and Giuliani, L. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology (2019).

 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.13215

 

Tumor Promotion by Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Below Exposure Limits for Humans. Lerchl, Klose, et al. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 459(4):585-590 (2015).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006291X15003988

 

Swedish Review Strengthen Grounds for Concluding that Radiation from Cellular and Cordless Phones is a Probable Human Carcinogen. Davis, Kesari, et al. Pathophysiology 20(2):123-129 (2013).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23664410/

 

Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact Between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones. West, Kapoor, et al. Case Reports in Medicine (2013).

 

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/crim/2013/354682/

 

Epidemiological Evidence for an Association Between Use of Wireless Phones and Tumor Diseases. Hardell, Carlberg, et al. PathoPhysiology 16(2-3):113-122 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19268551/

 

Study on Potential Effects of "902 MHz GSM-type Wireless Communication Signals" on DMBA-Induced Mammary Tumours in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Hruby, Neubauer, et al. Mutation Research 649(1-2):34-44 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17981079/

 

VI. Effects On DNA

 

Microwaves from Mobile Phones Inhibit 53BP1 Focus Formation in Human Stem Cells More Strongly Than in Differentiated Cells: Possible Mechanistic Link to Cancer Risk. Markova, Malmgren, et al. Environmental Health Perspectives 118(3):394-399 (2010).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2854769/

 

Radiofrequency Radiation and Gene/Protein Expression: A Review. McNamee and Chauhan. Radiation Research 172(3):265-287 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19708776/

 

Evaluation of HSP70 Expression and DNA Damage in Cells of a Human Trophoblast Cell Line Exposed to 1.8GHz Amplitude-Modulated Radiofrequency Fields. Valbonesi, Franzellotto, et al. Radiation Research 169(3):270-279 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18302482/

 

Gene and Protein Expression Following Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields from Mobile Phones. Vanderstraeten and Verschaeve. Environmental Health Perspectives 116(9):1131-5 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18795152/

 

Nonthermal Effects of RadioFrequency-Field Exposure on Calcium Dynamics in Stem Cell- derived Neuronal Cells: Elucidation of Calcium Pathways. Rao, Titushkin, et al. Radiation Research 169(3):319-329 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18302487/

 

Gene Expression Changes in the Skin of Rats Induced by Prolonged 35 GHz Millimeter-Wave Exposure. Millenbaugh, Roth, et al. Radiation Research 169(3):288-300 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18302488/

 

DNA Damage in Molt-4 T-lymphoblastoid Cells Exposed to Cellular Telephone Radiofrequency Fields in Vitro. Philips, Ivaschuk, et al. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 45(1):103-110 (1998).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302459898000749

 

VII. Neurological/Cognitive Effects

 

Early-Life Exposure to Pulsed LTE Radiofrequency Fields Causes Persistent Changes in Activity and Behavior in C57BL/6 J Mice. Broom, K., et al. Bio Electro Magnetics 40(7):498-511 (2019).

 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bem.22217

 

Are Rises in Electro-Magnetic Field in The Human Environment, Interacting with Multiple Environmental Pollutions, The Tripping Point for Increases in Neurological Deaths in the Western World? Pritchard, C., Silk, A. and Hansen, L. Medical Hypotheses 127: 76-83 (2019).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987719300040?via%3Dihub

 

Effect of 1800-2100 MHz Electromagnetic Radiation on Learning-Memory and Hippocampal Morphology in Swiss Albino Mice. Kishore, G., Venkatashu, K., and Sridevi, N. Jorunal of Clincal and Diagnostic Research 12(2): 14-17 (2019).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330729256_Effect_of_1800-2100_MHz_Electromagnetic_Radiation_on_Learning-Memory_and_Hippocampal_Morphology_in_Swiss_Albino_Mice

 

Monitoring of BALB/C Strain Mice Health, Investigation of Behavior, Hematological Parameters Under the Effect of an Electromagnetic Field. Zymantiene, J., et al. Medycyna Weterynarjna 75(03): 158-163 (2019).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330652562_Monitoring_of_BALBC_strain_mice_health_investigation_of_behavior_hematological_parameters_under_the_effect_of_an_electromagnetic_field

 

2.45 GHz Microwave Radiation Impairs Learning, Memory, and Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity in The Rat. Karimi, N., et al. Toxicology and Industrial Health 34(12): 873-883 (2018).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30345889/

 

Mobile Phone Distance From Head and Temperature Changes of Radio Frequency Waves on Brain Tissue. Forouharmajd, F., Ebrahimi, H. and Pourabdian, S. International Journal of Preventative Medicine (2018).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30123435/

 

A Prospective Cohort Study of Adolescents’ Memory Performance and Individual Brain Dose of Microwave Radiation from Wireless Communication. Foerster, M., et al. Environmental Health Perspectives 126(7) (2018).

 

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp2427#tab3

 

Electromagnetic Radiation 2450 MHz Exposure Causes Cognition Deficit with Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Activation of Intrinsic Pathway of Apoptosis in Rats. Gupta, S.K., Mesharam, M.K., and Krishnamurthy, S. Journal of Biosciences 43(2) 263-276 (2018).

 

https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/jbsc/043/02/0263-0276

 

The Effect of Wi-Fi Electromagnetic Waves in Unimodal and Multimodal Object Recognition Tasks in Male Rats.  Hassanshahi, A., et al. Neurological Sciences 38(6):1069-1076 (2017).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28332042/

 

Effects of Short and Long Term Electromagnetic Fields Exposure on the Human Hippocampus. Deniz, O.G., et al. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 5(4):191-197 (2017).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213879X17300524

 

Effects of Long Term Exposure of 900-1800 MHz Radiation Emitted from 2G Mobile Phone on Mice Hippocampus – A Histomorphometric Study. Mugunthan, Shanmugasamy, et al. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 10(:AF01-6 (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27656427/

 

Effect of Mobile Phone Radiation on Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Seizure Threshold in Mice. Kouchaki, Motaghedifard, et al. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 19(7):800-3 (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27635206/

 

Effects of 3 Hz and 60Hz Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Anxiety-Like Behaviors, Memory Retention of Passive Avoidance and ElectroPhysiological Properties of Male Rats. Rostami, Shahani, et al. J Lasers Medical Science 7(2):120-125 (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27330708/

 

Short-Term Memory in Mice is Affected by Mobile Phone Radiation. Ntzouni, Stamatakis, et al. PathoPhysiology 18(3):193-199 (2011).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21112192/

 

Use of Mobile Phones and Changes in Cognitive Function in Adolescents. Thomas, Benke, et al. Occupational Environmental Medicine 67(12):861-866 (2010).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20798018/

 

Increased Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Mammalian Brain 7 Days After Exposure to the Radiation from a GSM-900 Mobile Phone. Nittby, Brun, et al. PathoPhysiology 16(2-3):103-112 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19345073/

 

Effects of GSM 1800 MHz on Dendritic Development of Cultured Hippocampal Neurons. Ning, Xu, et al. Acta Pharmacol Sin28(12):1873-1880 (2007).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18031599/

 

Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation. Lai, Henry. Advances in Electromagnetic Fields in Living Systems1:27-80 (1994).

 

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-2542-4_2#page-1

 

VIII. Effects On Male Fertility

 

Long-Term Exposure to 4G Smartphone Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Diminished Male Reproductive Portential by Directly Disrupting Spck3-MMP2-BTB Axis in the Testes of Adult Rats. Yu, G., et al. Science of The Total Environment 698 (2020).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719338082?via%3Dihub

 

Radiations and Male Fertility. Kesari, K., Agarwal, A. and Henkel, R. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 16(118) (2018).

 

https://rbej.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12958-018-0431-1

 

The Effect of 2.45 GHz Non-Ionizing Radiation on the Structure and Ultrastructure of The Testis in Juvenile Rats. Histology and Histopathology(2018).

 

 

 

Modulatory Effect of 900 MHz Radiation on Biochemical and Reproductive Parameters in Rats. Narayana, SN., et al. Bratislava Medical Journal119(9):581-587 (2018).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30226070/

 

Aloe Arborescens Juice Prevents EMF-Induced Oxidative Stress and Thus Protects from Pathophysiology in the Male Reproductive System In Vitro. Solek, P., Majchrowics, L., and Koziorowski, M. Environmental Research 166:141-149 (2018).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118301063?via=ihub

 

Radiofrequency Radiation (900 MHz)-Induced DNA Damage and Cell Cycle Arrest in Testicular Germ Cells in Swiss Albino Mice. Pandey, N., et al. Toxicology and Industrial Health 33(4) 373-384 (2017).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27738269/

 

The Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Sperm Function. Houston, Nixon, et al. Reproduction (2016)

 

https://rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/152/6/R263.xml

 

Male Fertility and its Association with Occupational and Mobile Phone Tower Hazards: An Analytical Study. Al-Quzwini, Al-Taee, et al. Middle East Fertility Society Journal (2016).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569016300127

 

Sperm DNA Damage – The Effect of Stress and Everyday Life Factors. Radwan, M, et al. International Journal of Impotence Research 28, 148-154 (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27076112/

 

Electromagnetic Radiation at 900 MHz Induces Sperm Apoptosis through bcl-2, bax and caspase-3 Signaling Pathways in Rats. Liu, Si, et al. Journal of Reproductive Health 12:65 (2015).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4523914/

 

Habits of Cell Phone usage and Sperm Quality - Does It Warrant Attention? Zilverlight, Wiener-Megnazi, et al. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 31(3):421-426 (2015).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26206279/

 

Extremely Low frequency Magnetic Fields Induce Spermatogenic Germ Cell Apoptosis: Possible Mechanism. Lee, Park, et al. BioMed Research International (2014).

 

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/567183/

 

In Vitro Effect of Cell Phone Radiation on Motility, DNA Fragmentation and Clusterin Gene Expression in Human Sperm. Zalata, El-Samanoudy, et al. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility 9(1):129-136 (2014).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410031/

 

Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Reproductive System. Gye and Park. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 39(1):1-19 (2012).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341445/

 

Effects of the Exposure of Mobile Phones on Male Reproduction: A Review of the Literature. Vignera, Condorelli, et al. Journal of Andrology 33(3):350-356 (2012).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21799142/

 

Use of Laptop Computers Connected to Internet Through Wi-Fi Decreases Human Sperm Motility and Increases Sperm DNA Fragmentation. Avendano, C., et al. Fertility and Sterility 97(1):39045 (2012).

 

https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(11)02678-1/fulltext

 

Exposure to Magnetic fields and the Risk of Poor Sperm Quality. Li, Yan, et al. Journal of Reproductive Toxicology 29(1):86-92 (2010).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19910156/

 

Mobile Phone Radiation Induces Reactive Oxygen Species Production and DNA Damage in Human Spermatozoa In Vitro. Luliis, Newey, et al. PLoS ONE 4(7) (2009).

 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006446

 

Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation (Rf-EMR) from GSM Mobile Phones Induces Oxidative Stress and Reduces Sperm Motility in Rats. Mailankot, Kunnath, et al. Clinical Science 64(6):561-5 (2009).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19578660/

 

Cell Phones: Modern Man's Nemesis? Makker, Varghese, et al. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 18(1):148-157 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19146782/

 

Indicative SAR Levels Due to an Active Mobile Phone in a Front Trouser Pocket in Proximity to Common Metallic Objects. Whittow, Panagamuwa, et al. Propagation Conference 149-152 (2008).

 

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4516888/?reload=true&arnumber=4516888

 

Cell Phones and Male Infertility: Dissecting the Relationship. Deepinder, Makker, et al. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 15(3):266-270 (2007).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17854521/

 

Evaluation of the Effect of Using Mobile Phones on Male Fertility. Wdowiak, Wiktor, et al. Annals of Agricultural and Medicine14(1):169-172 (2007).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17655195/

 

Effect of Cell Phone Usage on Semen Analysis in Men Attending Infertility Clinic: An Observational Study. Agarwal, Deepinder, et al. American Society for Reproductive Medicine 89(1):124-8 (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17482179/

 

IX. Electromagnetic Sensitivity

 

Becoming Electro-Hypersensitive: A Replication Study. Dieudonne, M. Bioelectromagnetic 40: 188-200 (2019).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30920673/

 

Functional Brain MRI in Patients Complaining of Electrohypersensitivity After Long Term Exposure to Electromagnectic Fields. Heuser, G. & Heuser, S. Reviews on Environmental Health 32(3):291-299 (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28678737/

 

Hot Nano Spots" as an Interpretation of So-Called Non-Thermal Biological Mobile Phone Effects. Pfutzner, Helmut. Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications 8(3):62-69 (2016).

 

https://m.scirp.org/papers/65212

 

Analysis of the Genotoxic Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation Using Buccal Micronucleus Assay: A Comparative Evaluation. Banerjee, Singh, et al. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 10 (3):ZC82-ZC85 (2016).

 

https://www.emf-portal.org/en/article/29426

 

Tinnitus and Cell Phones: The Role of Electromagnetic Radiofrequency Radiation. Medeiros and Sanchez. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 82(1):97-104 (2016).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869415001639

 

Microwave Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) Produce Widespread Neuropsychiatric Effects Including Depression. Pall, Martin L. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy (2015).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281261829_Microwave_frequency_electromagnetic_fields_EMFs_produce_widespread_neuropsychiatric_effects_including_depression

 

Subjective Symptoms Related to GSM Radiation from Mobile Phone Base Stations: a Cross- Sectional Study. Gomez-Perretta, Navarro, et al. BMJ Open 3.12 (2013).

 

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/12/e003836.full

 

Green Communication- A Stipulation to Reduce Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity from Cellular Phones. Kumar, Khan, et al. Procedia Technology 4:682-686 (2012).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212017312003891

 

Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Fact or Fiction? Genius and Lipp. Science of the Total Environment 414(1):103-112 (2012).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711012733

 

Radiofrequency (RF) Sickness in the Lilienfeld Study: An Effect of Modulated Microwaves? Liakouris, A. Archives of Environmental Health 236-238 (2010).

 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00039899809605701?journalCode=vzeh20&

 

Neurobehavioral Effects Among Inhabitants Around Mobile Phone Base Stations. Abdel-Rassoul, El-Fateh, et al. NeuroToxicology28(2):434-440 (2007).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161813X06001835

 

Electrohypersensitivity: Sate-Of-The-Art of A Functional Impairment. Johansson, O. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 25(4): 245-258 (2006).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17178584/

 

Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity With Emphasis on Diabetes and Multiple Sclerosis. Havas, M. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 25(4): 259-268 (2006).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17178585/

 

Establishing the Health Risks of Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields Requires Multidisciplinary Research. Hietanen, Maila. Scandinavian Journal of Work, the Environment, and Health 32(3):169-170 (2006).

 

https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=994

 

Hypersensitivity of Human Subjects to Environmental Electric and Magnetic Field Exposure: A Review of the Literature. Levallois, Patrick. Environmental Health Perspectives 110(4):613-8 (2002).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11193169_Hypersensitivity_of_Human_Subjects_to_Environmental_Electric_and_Magnetic_Field_Exposure_A_Review_of_the_Literature

 

Electric Hypersensitivity and Neurophysical Effects of Cellular Phones - Facts or Needless Anxiety? Harma, Mikko Ilmari. Scandinavian Journal of Work, the Environment and Health 26(2):85-86 (2000).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298811242_Electric_hypersensitivity_and_neurophysiological_effects_of_cellular_phones_-_facts_or_needless_anxiety

 

X. Effects On Implanted Medical Devices

 

Ad Hoc Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing of Non-Implantable Medical Devices and Radio Frequency Identification. Seidman and Guag. Biomedical Engineering OnLine 12:71 (2013).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716957/

 

Electromagnetic Interference of Pacemakers. Lakshmanadoss, Chinnachamy, et al. Interchopen 229-252 (2011).

 

https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/13783.pdf

 

Interference Between Mobile Phones and Pacemakers: A Look Inside. Censi, Calcagnini, et al. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità 43(3):254-259 (2007).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17938456/

 

Electromagnetic Interference on Pacemakers. Erdogan, Okan. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal 2(3):74-78 (2002).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564060/

 

Electromagnetic Interference in Patients with Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Implantable Loop Recorders. Sousa, Klein, et al. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal 2(3):79-84 (2002).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564059/

 

Radiofrequency Interference with Medical Devices. A Technical Information Statement. IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 17(3):111-4 (1998).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9604711/

 

Cellular Telephones and Pacemakers: Urgent Call or Wrong Number? Ellenbogen and Wood. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 27(6):1478-9 (1996).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8626961/

 

XI. 5G Effects

 

Model of Steady-state Temperature Rise in Multilayer Tissues Due to Narrow-beam Millimeter-wave Radiofrequency Field Exposure. Gajda, G., et al. Health Physics 117(3):254-266 (2019).

 

https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00004032-201909000-00004

 

Untargeted Metabolomics Unveil Alterations of Biomembranes Permeability in HumanHaCaT Keratinocytes Upon 60 HGz Millimeter-Wave Exposure. Pogam, Pierre., et al. Scientific Reports 9(9343) (2019).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597695/

 

Ocular Response to Millimeter Wave Exposure Under Different Levels of Humidity. Kojima, M., et al. Journal of Infrared Milli Terahz Waves 40: 574–584 (2019).

 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10762-019-00586-0

 

Millimeter Wave Radiation Activates Leech Nociceptors via TRPV1-Like Receptor Sensitization. Romanenko, S., et al. Biophysical Journal 116(12): 2331-2345 (2019).

 

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2018/11/28/480665.full.pdf

 

Systematic Derivation of Safety Limits for Time-Varying 5G Radiofrequency Exposure Based on Analytical Models and Thermal Dose. Neufeld, E., and Kuster, N. Health Physics Society (2018).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30247338/

 

Towards 5G Communication Systems: Are There Health Implications? Ciaula, AD. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 367-375 (2018).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1438463917308143

 

5G Wireless Telecommunications Expansion: Public Health and Environmental Implications. Russell, C.L. Environmental Research 165:484-495 (2018).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118300161

 

The Human Skin As A Sub-THz Receiver – Does 5G Pose a Danger To It or Not? Betzalel, N., Ishai, P.B., and Feldman, Y. Environmental Research163:208-216 (2018).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118300331?via%3Dihub

 

The Modeling of the Absorbance of Sun-THz Radiation by Human Skin. Betzalel, N., Feldman, Y., and Ishai, P.B. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology 7(5):521-528 (2017).

 

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8016593/

 

Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink. Nasim, I. and Kim, S. Georgia Southern University (2017).

 

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.03683.pdf

 

The Human body and Millimeter-Wave Wireless Communication Systems: Interactions and Implications. Wu, T., Rappaport, T., and Collins, C. IEEE International Conference on Communications (2015).

 

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7248688

 

State of Knowledge on Biological Effects at 40-60 GHz. Drean, Y., et al. Comptes Rendus Physique (2013).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631070513000480

 

Effects of millimeter waves radiation on cell membrane-A brief review. Ramundo-Orlando, Alfonsina. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 31(12): 1400-1411 (2010).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220043219_Review_Article_Effects_of_millimeter_waves_radiation_on_cell_membrane

 

Human Skin as Arrays of Helical Antennas in Millimeter and Submillimeter Wave Range. Feldman, Y., et al. The American Physical Society (2008).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18517913/

 

XII. Miscellaneous Articles

 

Untargeted Metabolomics Unveil Alterations of Biomembranes Permeability in Human HaCaT Keratinocytes Upon 60 HGz Millimeter-Wave Exposure. Pogam, Pierre., et al. Scientific Reports  9(9343) (2019).

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-45662-6

 

Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices. Miller, A., et al. Frontiers in Public Health 7(223) (2019).

 

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223/full

 

Computational Simulations of The Penetration of 0.30 THz Radiation into the Human Ear. Vilaagosh, Z., et al. Biomedical Optics Express 10(3) (2019).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420278/

 

Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Risk Perception: A Pilot Experimental Study. Zeleke, B., et al. Environmental Research 170: 493-499 (2019).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S001393511830255X

 

Commentary on The Utility of The National Toxicology Program Study on Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation Data for Assessing Human Health Risks Despite Unfounded Criticisms Aimed at Minimizing the Findings of Adverse Health Effects. Melnick, R. Environmental Research 168:1-6 (2019).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118304973?via%3Dihub

 

Pathological Findings Observed in the Kidneys of Postnatal Male Rats Exposed to the 2100 MHz Electromagnetic Field. Bedir, R., et al. Archives of Medical Research (2019).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30600117/

 

Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Effects of Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Fields. Kocaman, A., et al. Environmental Research 163:71-79 (2018).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118300343?via%3Dihub

 

Non-Ionizing EMF Hazard in the 21st Century. Koh, W.J., and Moochhala, S.M. IEEE (2018).

 

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8393832

 

Thermal and Non-Thermal Health Effects of Low Intensity Non-Ionizing Radiation: An International Perspective.  Belpomme, D., et al. Environmental Pollution 242(A):643-658 (2018).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749118310157?via=ihub

 

Comparison of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Levels in Different Everyday Microenvironments in an International Context. Sagar, S, et al. Environmental International 114:297-306 (2018).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29529581/

 

Wi-Fi is an Important Threat to Human Health. Pall, M. Environmental Research 405-416 (2018).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300355

 

Mobile-Phone Radiation-Induced Perturbation of gene-Expression Profiling, Redox Equilibrium and Sporadic-Apoptosis Control in the Ovary of Drosophila Melanogaster. Manta, A., et al. FLY 11(2): 75-95 (2017).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406167/

 

World Health Organization, Radiofrequency Radiation and Health – A Hard Nut to Crack (Review). Hardell, L. International Journal of Oncology51:405-413 (2017).

 

https://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/51/2/405

 

Radiation from Wireless Technology Elevates Blood Glucose and Body Temperature in 40-Year-Old Type 1 Diabetic Male. Kleiber, C. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 36:3 259-264 (2017).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28524704/

 

Cardiovascular Disease: Time to Identify Emerging Environmental Risk Factors. Bandara, P. & Weller, S. European Journal of Preventative Cardiology (2017).

 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2047487317734898?rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org

 

Effects of Exposure to 2100MHz GSM-like Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field on Auditory System of Rats. Celiker, Ozgur, et al. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (2017).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27865708/

 

An Investigation of the Effect of Extremely Low Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Human Electrocardiograms (ECGs). Fang, Mahmoud, et al. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13(11) (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27886102/

 

Evaluation of the Protective Role of Vitamin C on the Metabolic and Enxymatic Activities of the Liver in the Male Rats After Exposure to 2.45 GHz of Wi-Fi Routers. Shekoohi-Shooli, F., et al. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 6(3):157-164 (2016).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27853723/

 

Exposure of ELF-EMF and RF-EMF Increase the Rate of Glucose Transport and TCA Cycle in Budding Yeast. Lin, Yan, et al. Frontiers in Microbiology (2016).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005349/

 

Awareness Campaign Against Cell Phone Radiation Hazard: Case Study Oman. Osmen and Saar. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 205(9):381-385 (2015).

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815050351

 

Electromagnetic Energy Radiated from Mobile Phone Alters Electrocardiographic Records of Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease. Alhusseiny, Al-Nimer, et al. Annals of Medical and Health Science Research 2(2):146-151 (2012).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23440607/

 

Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation on Human Ferritin: An in vitro Enzymun Assay. Fattahi-asl, Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi, et al. Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors 2(4):235-240 (2012).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23724375/

 

Apoptosis is Induced by Radiofrequency Fields through the Caspase-Independent Mitochondrial Pathway in Cortical Neurons. Joubert, Bourthoumieu, et al. Radiation Research 169(1):38-45 (2008).

 

https://www.rrjournal.org/doi/abs/10.1667/RR1077.1?journalCode=rare

 

Source of Funding and Results of Studies of Health Effects of Mobile Phone Use: Systematic Review of Experimental Studies. Huss, Egger, et al. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(1):1-4 (2007).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797826/

 

Epidemiology of Health Effects of Radiofrequency Exposure. Ahlbom, Green, et al. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(17):1741-1753 (2004).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253668/

 

The Possible Role of Radiofrequency Radiation in the Development of Uveal Melanoma Stang, Anastassiou, et al. Journal of Epidemiology 12(1):7-12 (2001).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11138823/

 

Biological Effects of Amplitude-Modulated Radiofrequency Radiation. Juutilainen and Seze. Scandinavian Journal of Work, the Environment and Health 24(2):245-254 (1998).

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9754855/

As I mentioned previously, governments have approved 5g standards and governments set RF emissions standards.

 

They have approved 5g technology, so your beef is with them. 

 

 

As I mentioned previously, governments have approved 5g standards and governments set RF emissions standards.

 

They have approved 5g technology, so your beef is with them.

 

I don’t have an issue or problem with anyone here, or the way things are. I only appreciate factual information and looking at things from as objective a perspective as I’m capable of.

Also, I’ve heard 5G is a stronger signal that works while a device is being used and that 4G is less strong but constant. So really I don’t know that I have an opinion, and am aware that there is a great deal I don’t know or understand about electromagnetic fields, technology and numerous areas relating to these topics.

 

What I do know is that one of the most lucrative industries on the planet is electronic communication which is composed of some of the richest companies that exist, and that these companies also fund politics and affect government policy. I know that these companies don’t necessarily have our bests interests in mind, but often and in countless ways lack morality or ethical principle and have goals that are profit-driven.

 

For anyone to broadly and finally state that emfs are of no concern and that radio frequencies have no affect on our physiology is unconvincing, however. Either they don’t have a good understanding of science, the scientific method, human, animal and plant systems and/or their opinion is driven by bias. That’s my take, and it seems pretty logically sound to me with my own understanding of cell structure, biology, the scientific method, and quite a few studies that have been done.

Right and in your first link they say right up front that more studies are needed as there is no definite correlation, only a suggestion of interaction.  Every 8 months or so, a study comes out saying the same.  I’m old enough to remember all of the same arguments being made when we moved from from analog to digital 2g networks.  Back then the reasoning was that the digital modulation was bad....

 

But if 5g is bad, then we better get rid of 4g too...oh and WiFi, and terrestrial broadcast networks.

 

Your biggest risk is getting skin cancer from the sun.  But even here, we know that the radiation from the sun isn’t always bad, lower levels can be beneficial. 

 

It is true that RF can be dangerous.  That’s why emissions regulations were created.  High power systems can cause significant heating of body tissues, but the emissions levels of cell phone systems is at a level where heating is undetectable, and then reduced some more to provide a factor of safety. 

 

 

Right and in your first link they say right up front that more studies are needed as there is no definite correlation, only a suggestion of interaction.  Every 8 months or so, a study comes out saying the same.  I’m old enough to remember all of the same arguments being made when we moved from from analog to digital 2g networks.  Back then the reasoning was that the digital modulation was bad....

 

But if 5g is bad, then we better get rid of 4g too...oh and WiFi, and terrestrial broadcast networks.

 

Your biggest risk is getting skin cancer from the sun.  But even here, we know that the radiation from the sun isn’t always bad, lower levels can be beneficial. 

 

It is true that RF can be dangerous.  That’s why emissions regulations were created.  High power systems can cause significant heating of body tissues, but the emissions levels of cell phone systems is at a level where heating is undetectable, and then reduced some more to provide a factor of safety.

 

I have said it should be looked into more thoroughly, I have not drawn a conclusion.

 

That the emfs are are at a level of heating which is undetectable is false. Laptops and cellphones emit warmth. Being in front of a desktop, laptop, or cellphone I can feel the difference in the lack of physical wellness and energy I feel.

 

I realize the first study I posted says this, but there you are with faulty reasoning trying to make an argument out of one study. Clearly, there are many which have been done and to me it looks like quite enough to make this an issue of importance and raise concern.

 

To go forward blindly because we like technology now and have based many activities and areas of income and organization around it is foolhardy.

The heat you feel is generated by the electrical resistance in the circuits of the device, not the RF being emitted from it.

 

Those studies you cite failed to influence regulatory bodies in governments around the world.  It is government agencies approve new technologies and set emission standards , not rich companies.  In the US, the FCC does this and they approved 5g.  In a prior job, I did site audits to ensure compliance.  These rules are taken seriously.

 

I think these rules are sensible, but if studies come out that show that the rules need to be changed, I am open to that.

 

 

The heat you feel is generated by the electrical resistance in the circuits of the device, not the RF being emitted from it.

 

Those studies you cite failed to influence regulatory bodies in governments around the world.  It is government agencies approve new technologies and set emission standards , not rich companies.  In the US, the FCC does this and they approved 5g.  In a prior job, I did site audits to ensure compliance.  These rules are taken seriously.

 

I think these rules are sensible, but if studies come out that show that the rules need to be changed, I am open to that.

 

The heat being emitted is electronic radiation and it’s altering atomical and molecular structure, and our physiology, whether it is radio-frequent or not.

 

I’m sure that I should trust the FCC about as much as I trust the FDA, still I’m not on a crusade.

 

Although I am not sure the rules are sensible, I am not trying to argue with you and also don’t want to. I appreciate that you would be open to evidence supporting caution around and potential revision of standards/rules by the FCC providing it is there. I don’t know when the FCC created the rules they have, nor if the members comprising the FCC have conflicting interests that would influence their decisions. My guess is that that it is comprised of members who have ethically compromised agendas.

 

I believe I have finally learned how pointless it is arguing on a website, or arguing in general, and I am not excited by debate anymore (I don’t even really want to be on this site.) I believe I am beginning to understand how fruitless many past activities have been in my life that I involved myself with, and how disordered my thinking was much of the time. Still it’s difficult not to comment when I see people making definitive statements about personal opinions they can’t prove, especially when it involves science and medicine.

Well that was fun to review.  This sentence (below) was in the abstract of one of the papers in your list.  I think it's a decent summary of the status of the compiled data. 

 

"The inconsistent results between similar studies and the same research groups have made it very difficult to make any comprehensive interpretation."